Air Conditioning

When Gail and Peter Leask renovated their 80s brick home on Belmont acreage two years ago, they knew they needed to improve its ventilation. With the help of an architect, the entire house was opened up, bigger windows and doors installed and a large …

In the climate science community it is generally acknowledged that co2 will cause some warming and aerosols cooling. If that is the case wouldn’t decreasing amounts of aerosols in the 80s and 90s, lead to some of the observed warming we saw during that time period?

To use another analogy. Lets say in a room we have a heater ( representing co2) and an air conditioner (representing aerosols) operating at the same time. If we turn down the air conditioner, wouldn’t the temperature of the room go up? Under the same reasoning, shouldn’t the temperature of the earth also have gone up?
When I talk about aerosols, I mean human aerosols and not natural ones like volcanoes.
I am going to hold you to your own standards. Peer review references please.
Baccheus: The problem is even if co2 levels had remained constant, temperatures would have still risen with the removal of aerosols. Then why does the IPCC maintain that the current warming is also all due to rise in co2?

In the climate science community it is generally acknowledged that co2 will cause some warming and aerosols cooling. If that is the case wouldn’t decreasing amounts of aerosols in the 80s and 90s, lead to some of the observed warming we saw during that time period?

To use another analogy. Lets say in a room we have a heater ( representing co2) and an air conditioner (representing aerosols) operating at the same time. If we turn down the air conditioner, wouldn’t the temperature of the room go up? Under the same reasoning, shouldn’t the temperature of the earth also have gone up?
When I talk about aerosols, I mean human aerosols and not natural ones like volcanoes.
I am going to hold you to your own standards. Peer review references please.